|
| |
Profile | FanTicker | Wall | Photos/Videos | Blog
|
Notes on Nomar's Retirement
|
|
Mary Paoletti wrote this 47 minutes ago | Permalink | 3 comments |

Baseball fans have all heard the news by now. I first saw the story this morning on Twitter:
@MikeGiardi : So the Sox are holding a press conference to announce Nomar's retirement. (CSNNE)
My immediate reaction? Somehow contact Governor of Red Sox Nation for Massachusetts, Jared Carrabis. Anyone who knows this guy knows that Jer is one of Nomar's biggest supporters among the Fenway faithful. True to form, Carrabis' response was classic.
"I could die right now Mary."
It was a sweet little slice of drama pie that made me smile. Sure, Jared was joking -- but just barely. The entire "Nomar retiring with the Red Sox" release blew the theater doors off the hinges. For the rest of the day, fans and media alike will extol Nomar's virtues as well as condemn the negatives.
That MLB debut home run on August 31, 1997 was an immediately endearing start. Earning American League Rookie of the Year honors sent his jersey flying off store shelves. Garciaparra hit .306 with 122 runs, 44 doubles, 30 home runs, 98 RBI, and 22 steals. He stroked a .350 average over the next three seasons, winning batting titles in 1999 and 2000. He was a six-time All Star.
But between the Spring of 2003 and when Garciaparra was traded in 2004, fans cried Foul while watching a favorite become a casualty of baseball business. Things turned ugly on the inside.
"[Nomar] couldn't keep his anger about the negotiations and lack of a new deal out of the Sox clubhouse. The other players all understood his anger, but they all felt that he had to let it go the second he stepped into their world....the clubhouse. They needed Nomar to do that and he couldn't.'' (Dan Roche, WBZ)
Reactions to the news, consequently, have been varied across the country.
@MarkNagi @knoxcounty same pride and honor which kept nomah on bench sulking while his team was on top step of dugout battling yanks? Led to his trade
@JCaLLy44 Just cried at work whole reading all the articles about Nomah.. God bless him!! He's the reason I love the RED SOX!! :)
My own leans closer to the latter. I too, adored Nomar. In fact, I'm only slightly embarrassed to admit that the username of my first ESPN.com account was NomarsGirl05. I loved his gritty shortstop style and the batter's box tics. Anticipating what he would produce at the plate each night was thrilling as hell. And one of the highlights of my 2009 Sox-watching season was actually being in attendance at Fenway when Garciaparra finally came home. His hand over his Oakland A's jersey -- over his heart -- he spun slowly around to soak in the crowd's ovation.
Did I cry? No. But neither did Nomar during today's presser. It was appropriate, I think because no tears need be shed for this celebration. The bashing should be shelved, too. Let Nomar's contract be extended to everyone -- just one day -- where we remember the 1999 Game 5 ALDS homer, the white hot .403 average that made July of 2000 feel frosty, and his triple-dinger birthday in 2002.
And then let's get on with the 2010 season.
--NomarsGirl05
Tags: Nomar Garciaparra Nomar Garciaparra retired Nomah
Show/Hide Comments
Comments
|
|
|
Why I'm Watching the Big East Tournament
|
|
Mary Paoletti wrote this 1 day ago | Permalink | 1 comment |

Today is truly the most glorious day of the year.
G'ahead -- throw Opening Day, the Superbowl, or the day you're getting your braces off at me. Doesn't matter. At noon today, the men's Big East Tournament begins at Madison Square Garden and I'm going to have to try to keep my head from blowing up.
I don't expect many people around the country to feel the same. Even with college hoops fans, the Final Four of the Big Dance -- the peak of March Madness -- is a far sexier affair. And yes, I absolutely appreciate when mid-majors out-muscle top dogs and Cinderellas flirt their way toward the finals. But I believe that the Big East is the best conference in the nation, so five days of heavyweight brawling is like sheer bliss.
Disagree with that? Read somebody else’s blog. Or check out some of this history.
You Like Suspense?
The Huskies crushed Pitt's 2002 hoop dreams in the championship when Taliek Brown hit a 35-foot shot clock killer in the second overtime to lead the Huskies to a 74-65 win. In 2009, UConn-Syracuse lasts six-overtimes in the quarterfinals. The Orange never lead in any of the five OTs, but Johnny Flynn lead the sixth to close things out 127-117. I got kicked out of the bar I was in right before the final frame started because it was closing time. But before I was even born, much less watching sports over beers, ‘Cuse forced a triple overtime final against Villanova in 1981. Leo Rautins' tipped in the insurance deuce as the clock ticked down to give the Orange an 83-80 win. His son, Andy (11.6ppg, 4.8apg), will be keeping the legacy of driving people bananas alive in this years tournament.
Maybe Starpower is Your Thing:
Patrick Ewing netted 69 points in three games in 1984, including 27-points and 16-rebounds in the title game. In the 1986 Championship it was Pearl Washington (SU) vs. St. John's star Walter Berry. Remember the days before Boston College turned traitor? Guard Dana Barros hit eight treys and scored 38 against SJU in 1989. The next year, Derrick Coleman (before he went mental) was lighting things up: 25 points and 23 rebounds in 'Cuse's semifinal win over 'Nova in 1990. Alonzo Mourning went off for 76 points in three games for the second-place Hoyas in 1992. Georgetown's Allen Iverson scored 38 in a 1996 quarterfinal game against Miami, and teammate Victor Page went for 34 the next day against Villanova. He then matched up vs. Allen Iverson when UConn faced against the Hoyas.
The past is impressive but there are too many highlights to even mention. Back in the present, today’s first round schedule looks a little something like this:
#16 DePaul vs #9 USF
#13 St. John's vs #12 Connecticut
#10 Seton Hall vs #15 Providence
#11 Cincinnati vs #14 Rutgers
Hall has beaten Louisville, Pitt, Cornell, and Cincinnati. Connecticut has beaten Texas, Villanova, and West Virginia. Providence stunned UC and has beaten the Johnnies. That St. John's squad bested Siena, Temple, and Georgia before BE play even started. Cincy dropped Vandy and Maryland out of conference and swept UConn within. Rutgers took down Georgetown, Louisville, and the Irish. USF his risen out of the cellar with wins over Kent St., Pitt, and G’Town. And even DePaul has upset potential after beating Northern Iowa in it’s second game of the season.
Trying to predict winners will take a Mensa-level basketball IQ. That or a Magic 8 Ball. And this is only Round 1. Just wait until Thursday’s quarterfinals tip off -- the front half of those games each feature a team in the nation’s top-16. By then I’ll be in the fetal position, sucking my thumb with glazed-eyes glued to the TV.
And I'll love every second of it.
Tags: 2010 Big East Tournament big east tournament
Show/Hide Comments
Comments
|
|
|
Matt Cooke's Hit on Marc Savard: Unacceptable
|
|
Mary Paoletti wrote this 2 days ago | Permalink | 5 comments |

Matt Cooke must be suspended.
Or stoned in the TD Garden parking lot by Bruins fans. But either way, something must be done. Cooke's hit on Marc Savard during the Penguins' 2-1 win was abhorrent. The Pittsburgh winger leveled Savard with an arm to the head that looked powered by the forearm and elbow instead of the shoulder, yet no penalty was called. Reportedly, refs told associate captain Patrice Bergeron that Cooke was finishing his check on Savard and so the cheap-shot wasn't whistled.
@HackswithHaggs Claude Julien told me last night Marc Savard had bit of subluxation to his jaw as a result of Cooke hit, but concussion was far more serious (Joe Haggerty of CSNNE)
Now let me say that hockey hits don't bother me; one of my favorite sounds in the sport is a solid board-rattling check. And the fighting? Love it. Hockeyfights.com is on my list of bookmarks because they've got clips of the ass-kicking in slow motion.
But there is a line between what's legal and what's dirty. Though NHL fans might get rabidly excited when the gloves get tossed, we don't want anybody to end up in the hospital. Busted lips and bloody noses? A job hazard. Getting strapped to a stretcher? A blow to the NHL itself.
The Pensburgh blog on SBNation asks:
"...is this a suspendable crime or just a hockey play gone bad?"
Well let's take a look at Matt Cooke for a hot second. He's no first-time offender.
James Murphy from NESN noted that this season Cooke was already slapped with a two-game suspension for an open-ice hit on Rangers forward Artem Anisimov. His rap sheet also includes two earlier two-gamers and "a knee-on-knee hit to Carolina's Erik Cole during the playoffs last spring ." Around the league -- among his peers -- Cooke is notorious.
"Figures it was him," B's blue liner Dennis Wideman told the New England Sports Network.
Doesn't sound like a guy who just exercises honest fundamentals.
Of course, judgment isn't up to the fans or even the media. What is important now is for the NHL to take decisive action against Cooke's hit. A strong statement must be made to a guy who seems to both try to get away with what he can and shrug off suspensions as mini-vacations when he does get busted. Patrice Bergeron, Marc Savard, and every other player around the league need to know that there are adequate measures in place to protect them.
Otherwise, this could happen again... and the next time it could be worse.
(Boston Herald photo)
Tags: Matt Cooke hit Matt Cooke suspension Marc Savard concussion
Show/Hide Comments
Comments
|
|
|
Mike Krzyzewski Ruined My Morning
|
|
Mary Paoletti wrote this 4 days ago | Permalink | 4 comments |

Most mornings I tune into the Dan Patrick Show to get my sports talk fix. I listen streaming online instead of watching on Direct TV 101, not just because I haven't yet had cable installed in my new apartment, but because this is not a superficial ritual. My DP appreciation goes beyond that money-making mane of his.
Today's docket of guests featured a particular highlight for an NCAA hoops-head like me: Duke head coach Mike Krzyzewski.
Unfortunately my laptop's passion bucket was full of failure this morning and I missed his spot. Why such a bummer when I'm a UConn alumna? I respect Krzyzewski; his coaching, his character, and the struggle he must have faced growing up with a last name that's so hard to spell. This also means that I respect what he has to say about the sport.
But when I checked out Twitter to see what went down:
@dpshow Coach K on the best team right now.."I'd say Syracuse, even above Kansas to be frank with you."
'Cuse: The anti-Mary.
As if this year hasn't been painful enough with my Huskies bouncing between glory and the NCAA slum gutter, it has all coincided with Syracuse staging a bounce back bigger than Flavor Flav. Sure, there are plenty of rivalries within the Big East, but when I was at Connecticut, the fiercest wars waged in the conference were between UC and the Orange.
I stood just three rows back when Hakim Warrick and Rudy Gay met on the hardwood in 2005. That game showcased one of the most stupidly athletic one-on-one match ups I've ever seen live. In 2006 I was in New York when one of Connecticut's best teams in recent years was single-handedly buried by Gerry McNamara in the Big East Tournament. And last year's 6-OT BE tourney stunner was reportedly one of the most agonizing UC losses in the rivalry. My friend Samuel Adams thankfully helped me blank that game from my memory that night.
Surviving the season so far, watching the Orange scale the top-25 while Connecticut slides off and on the bubble, has required a certain amount of denial.
Syracuse simply can't be that good, I'd think to myself. Impossible.
Coach K blew all of that up on the DP Show today. When he tagged Jim Boeheim's crew as the best in the nation it was as good as forcing me to shake hands with reality. And then consent to being slapped around by it.
Luckily it's Friday and I'm in Boston. My plan? Two dates with Sam Adams and two days without Dan Patrick.
Tags: Dan Patrick Show DP Show
Show/Hide Comments
Comments
|
|
|
The Defense of J.D. Drew
|
|
Mary Paoletti wrote this 6 days ago | Permalink | 5 comments |

Many Red Sox fans hate J.D. Drew.
This is not news. His supposed flaws have been so over-discussed over the last three years that they're no longer issues that are analytically explored but a list of gripes that are enumerated on a nightly basis.
He is considered a bust in Boston: Too much money for too little production. Instead of playing through pain 'Nancy Drew' would rather sit on the disabled list, say the hecklers. He's a robot, they say, who simply goes through the motions without any real passion for the game. And perhaps most offensive is the fact that Drew is consistently defended -- unjustifiably, so the cynics say -- by Theo Epstein.
'Theo's boy,' they snarl after watching him strikeout.
The verdict is so widely accepted that it's considered a closed case by most. But as the doors swung wide at Fort Myers' spring training facility some members of the media tried to open things back up on J.D. Drew.
Amalie Benjamin wrote a piece for the Globe that expounded the virtues of the Red Sox left fielder on February 14. One strategy was statistics
“Drew was one of just 10 players who "had an OPS (on-base plus slugging percentage) of .900 or greater in 2008 and ’09.
...since he signed with Boston, Drew has gotten on base at a .390 clip. That stands as fourth-best among outfielders in baseball in that span.
...his OBP rises with men on base, from .388 to .397. His batting average, however, is higher with the bases empty (.280 vs. .286).''
Yet the article's comments section showed that some in the Beantown crowd remain unconvinced.
“I care about commitment and production and he doesn't do either very well. RBI's and HR's matter,” read one quip. “Drew is as boring a player as I've ever seen. I couldn't care less about his OPS. I want people who play with passion and JD "Pampers" Drew has exactly none of it,” read another.
Michael Silverman took a different approach today in the Herald by discussing Drew's own take on fielding.
“I take pride in what I do defensively as much, if not more, than I do on any other level of the game,” J.D. told reporters. “People overlook that all the time. It’s always an offensive thing with me - ‘What have you done for me;’ ‘You didn’t do this, you didn’t do that.’ I think one of the biggest and best things you can probably read about a player is you don’t read about his bad defensive mishaps.
“I’m not a flashy guy, but I think I get great jumps on the ball and I run deceivingly. I’m not a guy who looks like I’m running fast. And people criticize me, ‘Oh, he’s not hustling.’ ”
Is Drew's glove-work a good enough defense against his detractors? His words certainly contain the passion that people accuse him of lacking.
Unfortunately for J.D., there is a large subset of Boston baseball lovers that possesses an unforgivingly romantic notion of what would make the left fielder worthy of his $70 million contract: Home runs and RBI; big bat heroics and overt emotion that matches the fans' own.
Drew seems personally satisfied with the effort his body allows him so that much is not up for debate this season. But Red Sox fans will continue to judge him. Will staying healthy and producing at the plate be enough to restore his reputation among the Fenway faithful? Or is his legacy already written past the point of revision?
We'll find out soon enough.
Show/Hide Comments
Comments
|
|
|